A typedef-name can also be introduced by an alias-declaration. The identifier following the using keyword becomes a typedef-name and the optional attribute-specifier-seq following the identifier …

Feb 5, 2018 · This is backed by [dcl.typedef]: A typedef-name can also be introduced by an alias-declaration. The identifier following the using keyword becomes a typedef-name and the optional …

Mar 22, 2022 · This typedef pattern has roots in C (in C struct prefix has to be used to use struct symbol or can be replaced by typedef) and is obsolete in C++. using is C++ only. So answer should be obvious.

Jun 27, 2012 · Possible Duplicate: What are the differences between typedef and using in C++11? The following code compiles and runs. My question is what is the difference between the "typedef" and …

Feb 6, 2023 · 9 using (or typedef before C++11) is the preferred approach. It creates a proper type alias that is actually treated by the compiler as a type and as nothing else. One very important reason …

Jun 12, 2013 · 6 Using just brings declaration into the local scope, while typedef introduces a typedef-name. One difference between them is elaborated type specifiers, e.g.:

Mar 3, 2016 · Какие есть отличия using от typedef кроме того, что using работает с шаблонами? Если только в этом, то почему нельзя было добавить эту поддержку в typedef?

NOTE: This is not a clone of the "difference between using and typedef" question. I know that using gives the advantage of defining a family of typedef s. What I am asking is why did the standard …

Nov 3, 2009 · typedef can be used to give aliases to types (which you could probably do with #define as well), but it's safer because of the find-and-replace nature of #define constants. Besides that, you …

Aug 7, 2017 · I know that the "using" keyword could be used as template alias and type alias, but I didn't see anyone has mentioned that "typedef typename" could be replaced by "using". So could it?