"The Court has jurisdiction to enforce its preliminary injunctions to preserve the status quo, but it does not have ...

The immediate impact of the high court's ruling — particularly in the innumerable challenges to Trump’s effort to reshape the federal government — may be limited.

Effective immediately, the Trump administration can begin planning for how it would implement an end to birthright ...

On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court held, in a 6-3 decision in Trump v. Casa, that federal courts lack the authority to ...

By limiting the ability of a single judge to halt executive actions across the nation, the court has restored balance to the ...

Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case ...

A divided Supreme Court has ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions, but the decision ...

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan once opposed the practice of district judges issuing national injunctions before siding ...

Trump on Friday celebrated a Supreme Court decision limiting nationwide injunctions issued against his executive order to ...

The judicial insurrection can still block President Trump's policies in the courts, despite the Supreme Court's ruling in ...

Friday’s decision limits the circumstances under which the court can issue nationwide injunctions — orders that stop a federal law or policy from being enforced while court battles play out.

In Trump v. CASA, the Supreme Court significantly narrowed federal courts’ power to issue “universal” or “nationwide” ...